| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1. o.O New station environments! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP t0rfifrans wrote: Eli Green wrote: kind of looks like one of those LCO landing pads, next to a sideways acceleration gate with a station in the background, ergo dev haks Indeed. Unfortunatly, these are not coming in Retribution, this i...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2012.10.16 15:59:00
|
2. ECM is Killing Solo PvP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Doyey3731 wrote: Well not that alone, but it's certainly playing it's part. I like going out for a roam alone and losing a ship. I'm not into the whole large gang stuff, been there done that. So I like going out, knowing I'm going to die but t...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2012.10.02 14:15:00
|
3. Same old Question - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: LOL...right..... The NEW changes to NPC AI in non-Incursions and non-Sleepers. The HUGE changes to player bounties. ... blabla I'm a useless whiner blabla They're reworking existing systems which have been in a mi...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2012.10.02 13:42:00
|
4. This game is shallow - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Disagree with OP on the game being shallow. I do agree that many of the game features should be much more interesting in terms of gameplay. CCP have the "big picture" right, but many of the core gameplay mechanics are in dire need of an overhaul ...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2012.10.01 10:57:00
|
5. "It looks so small," She said - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The sizes are mostly correct. It's purely a camera thing. If you were able to freely move the camera around you'd immediately see that a Titan is ginormous compared to a cruiser due to parallax and such. You never get a real sense of scale becau...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2012.09.26 12:33:00
|
6. "It looks so small," She said - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ships appear small because the camera is always locked and centered on them. The only way you will get a real sense of scale is with a free camera. This is why you get that sense of scale when you look at a trailer of eve or use the advanced camer...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2012.09.26 07:49:00
|
7. Looking for Corp (47.7m SP) - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Thanks again for offers! Haven't decided on anything yet so this is still open. Some of you asked what I'm looking for in a corp as I wasn't too specific about it. Well... thing is I don't really care what a corp does so long as it doesn't specia...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2012.09.24 06:39:00
|
8. Looking for Corp (47.7m SP) - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Thanks for the offers so far. Still checking all of them and also getting my business and settings back on track so please don't be offended if I don't get back to you right away.
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2012.09.23 17:18:00
|
9. Looking for Corp (47.7m SP) - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Hi Just re-opened my account and figured I'd try and join a corp. About me: I'm a 29 year old dude living in germany. Always relaxed and online whenever there's nothing else to do, so I play anywhere between 10 to maybe 30 something hours ...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2012.09.23 12:15:00
|
10. Active Tanking (CCP, please read) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Orien Ardent wrote: Well, I guess it depends how you look at it. To me it seems it would work very similar to shield buffer, except that you can toggle it, and it drains cap instead of shield hp. Not saying it's a bad idea, but it isn't exactly...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2011.11.22 11:27:00
|
11. Active Tanking (CCP, please read) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Orien Ardent wrote: MaiLina KaTar wrote: ... Unless I missed something in your suggestion, your solution isn't fixing active tanking, it's just turning it into a third type of buffer tanking, capacitor one, which is similar to shield buffe...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2011.11.22 10:46:00
|
12. Reasons why boosters side effects should remain in-game - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Akita T wrote: MaiLina KaTar wrote: Akita T wrote: I might agree that SOME level of side-effects should still exist for NON-MAXIMALLY-SKILLED people. But you should be able to nullify most if not all side-effects with either maxed-out ski...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2011.11.22 09:11:00
|
13. Active Tanking (CCP, please read) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Esan Vartesa wrote: Read it, and sorry, don't love it. No you didn't. It's not even about diminishing returns on volleys in fleet fights. But y'know what? **** it. With the attention span of like 5 seconds people have in this game and specia...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2011.11.22 09:01:00
|
14. Reasons why boosters side effects should remain in-game - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Billy Colorado wrote: 'cause I think it's going to take some playing to see how people react. No. Not at all. Look around the gaming world. This has been done before and it failed every time. Nobody , except for the lunatic Korean / Chines...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2011.11.21 21:57:00
|
15. Active Tanking (CCP, please read) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This still going? I posted the solution on page 5 already. Read it , think about it, like it, pass it on, cause you know it's awesome.
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2011.11.21 21:48:00
|
16. Reasons why boosters side effects should remain in-game - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Logit Probit wrote: Hey CCP: I'll spell it out for you. PEOPLE DID INDEED ASK YOU TO CHANGE BOOSTERS Fixed. More specifically, some felt that it was a niche part of the industry side of EVE and wanted to see both increased ...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2011.11.21 13:00:00
|
17. We seriously need to chill out a little... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Astrid Stjerna wrote: Trainwreck McGee wrote: This game is insanely complicated and should be under constant revision That's why it's not under constant revision -- this game is far more complex than most MMOs. As a matter of fact i...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2011.11.18 10:35:00
|
18. 'winning' - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Silent Lamb wrote: again, if you (like several others) had read all my posts you'd have read that I've already unsubbed all my accounts. as I pay for them in yearly subscriptions a few of them have 7 to 10 months left of being active. that sai...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2011.11.17 14:06:00
|
19. We seriously need to chill out a little... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Benilopax wrote: What say you? Well. Though rage goes far beyond what I feel about the whole thing (really don't give a **** at the end of the day to be honest), I'm not really all that hyped on Crucible. To me it's like CCP going -+We're f...
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2011.11.17 13:54:00
|
20. 'winning' - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Silent Lamb wrote: walls upon walls of very bitter, arrogant, elitist, rambling drivel Dude. Quit the game asap. You clearly had way too much of it. Consider visiting a psychologist. I'm serious.
- by MaiLina KaTar - at 2011.11.17 13:31:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |